Virtues/Moral Integration

< Virtues

Introduction

Moral integration is the virtue of doing good. This requires determining what the right thing to do is, and then doing exactly that.

Moral integration unites the various virtues and motivates your good actions. The virtues are mere abstractions until they are applied and acted upon, and moral integration prepares us for that action.

Although they have been treated separately so far, the virtues are interdependent. For example if your grandmother says to you, “I fear I am getting old, how do I look?” you might answer from the virtue of gentleness, “You seem as young as I can ever remember” or you could answer from the virtue of good faith, “Yes, I noticed immediately that you look much older than when I last saw you”, or perhaps you can answer from love, “You always look great to me and I am so glad to see you.”

In another example, you, along with many others, receive an enthusiastic email from a friend linking to hateful and misleading propaganda vilifying your preferred political candidate. The virtues of politeness and perhaps tolerance tell you to ignore it. The virtues of good faith and perhaps justice, and courage tell you to vigorously refute and denounce every falsehood and misleading statement. The virtue of wisdom, along with a bit of courage, and love, tell you to reply all with your carefully written statement that glaring errors and malicious prejudices in the original message are obvious, advising readers to check facts themselves before forwarding rumors and propaganda, and reminding the sender of the importance of informed citizens and responsible dialogue to a strong democracy.

Deciding to use capital punishment provides a more significant and more difficult example to analyze. While justice probably argues for its use, gentleness, and certainly mercy argue against it. Compassion has to be considered from several points of view, including the accused, the victims’ families, and perhaps others. Wisdom might ask what option reduces the overall amount of suffering, in both the short and long term.

When such dilemmas arise, embracing the virtue of love can often guide us to the best resolution. Perhaps John Lennon was correct when he told us. “All you need is love.”

Moral integration requires constant vigilance. Barry McGuire lamented, “You can hate your neighbor but don’t forget to say grace.” Being a saint some of the time does not make up for being a bastard at other times. Doing good requires not doing bad.

The Virtue of Moral Integration

Moral integration is a virtue because neglecting to do good is not.

Everyday Moral Integration

Practice the virtue of Moral Integration every day in these ways:

Assignment

Part 1:

  1. Recall a time when you were conflicted and could not decide what the right thing to do was. Describe the dilemma you were facing.
  2. Consider each relevant virtue one at a time and how it applies to this dilemma. What solution or course of action would that virtue alone suggest?
  3. Now consider the issue from the standpoints of wisdom, courage, and love. Do these virtues suggest some solution, perhaps synthesized from the earlier options, that seems right? Describe this solution. Is it the right thing to do?

Part 2:

  1. Choose a significant long-debated public policy dilemma, such as the use of capital punishment, voluntary euthanasia, Same-sex marriage, legalizing marijuana use, or some other issue to analyze for this assignment.
  2. Consider how each of the relevant virtues applies to the issue. The virtues analysis form may help you organize your thinking on this.
  3. Based on the analysis in step 2, how would you decide the issue for the good? Describe how you arrived at your decision.

Part 3:

  1. Study the moral virtue of the late Senator Ted Kennedy as his career evolved. Note that early in his career he was responsible for the death of Mary Jo Kopechne. However, later on he became a distinguished senator.
    1. Alternatively you may wish to study Thomas Jefferson, the celebrated patriot, president, slave owner, and adulterer.
  2. Do you believe that: 1) the moral excellence he showed more than overcomes his moral lapses, or 2) his moral lapses cause irreparable damage and reveal character flaws that are never compensated for by his moral excellence?
  3. Assuming you live a morally ordinary life without egregious moral lapses or heroic moral excellence, do you rate yourself morally superior to Senator Ted Kennedy, morally inferior to him, or about the same?

Part 4:

  1. Read and study the Wikipedia article on Lawrence Kohlberg's stages of moral development.
  2. For the answers you gave in parts 2 and 3 above, decide what stage of moral development each of your answers represents.

References

    Further Reading

    Students interested in learning more about the virtues of moral integration may be interested in the following materials:

    This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Thursday, February 11, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.