Error of Analysis of Newton-Cotes formulas

Error Analysis of Newton-Cotes formulas

The Newton-Cotes formulas are a group of formulas for evaluating numeric integration at equally spaced points.

The Methods[1]

Let x_i, i=0,\ldots,n, be n+1 equally spaced points, and f_i be the corresponding values. Let h be the space h=x_{i+1}-x_i, and let s be the interpolation variable s=\frac{x-x_0}{h}. Thus to interpolate at x,

\begin{align}x-x_0&=sh\,,\\x-x_1&=x-(x_0+h)=(s-1)h\,,\\\vdots\\x-x_n&=(s-n)h\,.\end{align}

A polynomial P_n(x) of degree n can be derived to pass through these points and approximate the function f(x). Using divided differences and Newton polynomial, P_n(x) can be obtained as

\begin{align}P_n(x)&=[f_0]+[f_0,f_1](x-x_0)+\cdots+[f_0,\ldots,f_n](x-x_0)(x_1)\ldots(x-x_{n-1})\\
&=[f_0]+[f_0,f_1]sh+\cdots+[f_0,\ldots,f_n]s(s-1)\ldots(s-n+1)h^n\,.\end{align}

From the general form of polynomial interpolation error, the error of using P_n(x) to interpolate f(x) can be obtained as

\begin{align}E_{\text{interpolate}}(x) &=f(x)-P_n(x)\\&=\frac{1}{(n+1)!}(x-x_0)(x-x_1)\cdots (x-x_n)f^{(n+1)}(\xi)\\&=\frac{1}{(n+1)!}s(s-1)(s-2)\ldots (s-n)h^{n+1}f^{(n+1)}(\xi)\end{align}

where x_0\leqslant\xi\leqslant x_n.

Since  dx=d(x_0+sh)=hds, the error term of numerical integration is

E_{\text{integrate}}=\int\limits_{x_0}^{x_n}E_{\text{interpolate}}(x)dx =\frac{h^{n+2}}{(n+1)!}f^{(n+1)}(\xi)\int\limits_{0}^{n}s(s-1)\cdots (s-n)ds\,.

 

 

 

 

(1 )

Error terms for different rules

The Trapezoid Rule

Let's consider the trapezoid rule in a single interval. In each interval, the integration uses two end points. Thus n+1=2. Then n=1. Applying (1 ), we get

E_{\text{integrate}}=h\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{s(s-1)}{2}h^2f''(\xi)ds=-\frac{1}{12}h^3f''(\xi)=O(h^3)

where x_0 \leqslant \xi \leqslant x_1 . Thus the local error is O(h^3). Consider the composite trapezoid rule. Given that n=\frac{x_n-x_0}{h}, the global error is

\begin{align}\left|\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} -\frac{1}{12}h^3f''(\xi_i)\right|&=n[-\frac{1}{12}(x_n-x_0)h^2f''(\bar{\xi})]\\
&=-\frac{1}{12}(x_n-x_0)h^2f''(\bar{\xi})=O(h^2)\,,\end{align}

 

 

 

 

(2 )

where x_i \leqslant \xi_i \leqslant x_{i+1}, x_0 \leqslant \bar{\xi} \leqslant x_n.

To justify (2 ), we can need the theorem below[2] in page 345:

If g(x) is continuous and the c_i\ge 0, then for some value \theta  in the interval of all the arguments 
 g(\theta) \sum c_i=\sum\limits_{i=1}^N c_ig(\theta_i)\,.

The Simpson's 1/3 Rule

Consider Simpson's 1/3 rule. In this case, three equally spaced points are used for integration. Thus n+1=3. Applying (1 ), we get

E_{\text{integrate}}=h\int\limits_{0}^{2}\frac{s(s-1)(s-2)}{6}h^3f'''(\xi)ds=0

where x_0 \leqslant \xi \leqslant x_2 .

This doesn't mean that the error is zero. It simply means that the cubic term is identically zero. The error term can be obtained from the next term in the Newton polynomial, obtaining

E_{\text{integrate}}=h\int\limits_{0}^{2}\frac{s(s-1)(s-2)(s-3)}{24}h^4f^{(4)}(\xi)ds=-\frac{1}{90}h^{5}f^{(4)}(\xi)=O(h^5)\,.

Thus the local error is O(h^5) and the global error is O(h^4).

The Simpson's 3/8 Rule

Consider Simpson's 3/8 rule. In this case, n+1=4 since four equally spaced points are used. Applying (1 ), we get

E_{\text{integrate}}=h\int\limits_{0}^{3}\frac{s(s-1)(s-2)(s-3)}{24}h^4f^{(4)}(\xi)ds=-\frac{3}{80}h^5f^{(4)}(\xi)=O(h^5)

where x_0 \leqslant \xi \leqslant x_3 .

Both the Simpon's 1/3 rule and the 3/8 rule have error terms of order h^5. With smaller coefficient, the 1/3 rule seems more accurate. Then why do we need the 3/8 rule? The 3/8 rule is useful when the total number of increments n is odd. Three increments can be used with the 3/8 rule, and then the rest even number of increments can be used with 1/3 rule.

A Numerical Example

Given the set of data points, solve the numerical integration I=\int\limits_{3.1}^{3.9}f(x)dx

x f(x)=-\frac{1}{x}
3.1 -0.32258065
3.5 -0.28571429
3.9 -0.25641026

Solution

Use the trapezoid rule. First try h=0.8. That is, use only the two end points. We can get

I(h=0.8)=\frac{0.8}{2}(-0.32258065-0.25641026)=-0.23159636

Compared with the exact solution I=-0.22957444 we have

E_{\text{integrate}}=0.00202192\,.

Using all three points with h=0.4 we can get

I(h=0.4)=\frac{0.4}{2}(-0.32258065-2\times 0.28571429-0.25641026)=-0.23008389

and so

E_{\text{integrate}}=0.00050945\,.

Thus the error ratio is  \frac{E_{\text{integrate}}(h=0.8)}{E_{\text{integrate}}(h=0.4)}=3.97. This is close to what we can get by inspecting

\frac{E_{\text{integrate}}(h)}{E_{\text{integrate}}(h/2)}=\frac{O(h^2)}{O(h/2)^2}=2^2=4.

Exercises

Exercise 1[3]

Using the data given below, find the maximum error incurred in using Newton's forward interpolation formula to approximate x=0.14.

x e^x
0.1 1.10517
0.2 1.22140
0.3 1.34986
0.4 1.49182
0.5 1.64872

Exercise 2

When using Simpson's 1/3, what is the error ratio supposed to be?

References

  1. Hoffman, Joe D. (2001). Numerical Methods for Engineers and Scientists (2nd ed.). Marcel Derkker, INC. ISBN 0-8247-0443-6.
  2. Hamming, R. W. (1986). Numerical Methods for Scientists and Engineers (2nd ed.). New York: Dover Publications, INC. ISBN 0-486-65241-6. http://books.google.com/books/about/Numerical_Methods_for_Scientists_and_Eng.html?id=Y3YSCmWBVwoC.
  3. Tenenbaum, Morris; Pollard, Harry (1985). Ordinary Differential Equations: An Elementary Textbook for Students of Mathematics, Engineering, and the Sciences. New York: Dover Publications, INC. ISBN 0-786-64940-7.
This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Sunday, March 13, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.