Second Journal of Science/Past issues/A
< Second Journal of Science < Past issues
There are two ways to referee:
- To send a confidential review, send an email via Special:EmailUser/Guy vandegrift or to guy.vandegrift@wright.edu.
- Click the m (manuscript) number to see the abstract an leave your comments on the associated talk page.
Click to understand columns in sortable table
Use this page to check the status of a submission and/or review or discuss it.
- This table is sortable. Click the "P" (priority) entry in the top row until the lowest P-numbers are on top. These are the articles in most need of refereeing.
What needs to be done right now: At the moment, we have two 5 priorities (unabridged wiki articles) and one 6 priority, which is a wiki article that has been carefully reviewed already.
- m is the manuscript number
- P is the priority for review: 1= highest priority (manuscript submitted by single author or collaborative team); 3 = abridged "wiki" article in need of review ; 5 = "wiki article in need of review"; 7 = sufficiently reviewed; 9 = withdrawn.
- C is a subject classification scheme under construction
- Title is the permalink version
- v(i) volume issue
- R is how to be reviewed: "o" means open review, "cc" means that readers are invited to comment, but that we also seed confidential reviews. "∅" means unrefereed article for zeroth issue (mockup) edition only
- n the note: date received, nominator, and other information
Click to view manuscript n notes
- ↑ Nominated by user:Guy vandegrift Jan 2016. by This will remain in the mockup zeroth edition. But will never be published in this form because (1) it is not suitable and (2) because it was written by the editor. You are welcome to heavily edit and submit with both of us as co-authors. I will not accept until the mathematical level is greatly reduced.
- ↑ Nominated by Guy vandegrift Jan 2016. This has been tentatively accepted as this journal's first refereed article.
- ↑ Nominated by Guy vandegrift Jan 2016. This cannot be published because the editor wrote it and because it is not yet suitable. If you wish to reduce the length of this timeline by a factor and republish under your own name, leave a message at User:Guy vandegrift
- ↑ Nominated by eihter Mikeu or Guy vandegrift on 1/19/16. I would like to see this published, pending a favorable review by anyone.
- ↑ I (Editor Guy vandegrift) wrote this and would like to see it published. It needs a favorable review by two people who have no reason to make me happy. That means you must have no aspirations to submit an article to this journal. And, at least one of you must be an experienced teacher of quantum mechanics.
- ↑ Nominated by Mikeu 2/17/2016