Parapsychology/Extrasensory Perception

< Parapsychology

Rhine (1940/1966). ESP After Sixty Years.

Rhine & Pratt (1954). A review of the Pearce-Pratt distance series of ESP tests.

Pratt & Woodruff (1939). Size of stimulus symbols in extrasensory perception.

Hansel (1961). A Critical Analysis of the Pearce-Pratt Experiment.

Hansel (1961). A Critical Analysis of the Pratt-Woodruff Experiment.

Rhine & Pratt (1961). A Reply to the Hansel Critique of the Pearce-Pratt series.

Pratt & Woodruff (1961). Refutation of Hansel's allegation concerning the Pratt-Woodruff Series.

Honorton (1967). ESP: A Scientific Evaluation, C.E.M. Hansel, Review.

Pratt (1976). New Evidence supporting the ESP Interpretation of the Pratt-Woodruff experiment.

Honorton (1975). Error Some Place!

see also: Hansel (1980). ESP and Parapsychology: A Critical Re-evaluation.

see also: Marcello Truzzi's commentary on the research of C.E.M. Hansel (Zetetic Scholar, 7, p. 5)

see also: Mauskopf & McVaugh (1980). The Elusive Science: Origins of Experimental Psychical Research.

see also: Zingrone (2006). From Text to Self: The Interplay of Criticism and Response in the History of Parapsychology.

This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Tuesday, May 27, 2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.