PD Neuroprotection

< Back to: Therapy

While at present there are no substances that have proven neuroprotective properties for the treatment of Parkinson's, a number of substances and strategies are being researched with indications that it may be possible to slow down or halt the pathogenic process. A recent trial of Exendin-4, a drug already used for the treatment of diabetes, is an example of this.^[1]

See notes on page development on Talk page

Definition

‘Neuroprotection’ can imply that there are therapies which inhibit neurodegeneration from taking place. Alternatively, in cases where someone has been diagnosed as having a neural deficit, it means that the condition can be prevented from worsening. Either way it presents the researcher with the problem of proving a negative, i.e. of showing that something which would otherwise have happened did not happen.

This can be avoided in tests in vitro or with fast breeding animal models, but can present difficulties in assessing humans

One way of doing this is to collect information on a large group of people, to monitor their health over an extended timescale, and to identify differences between those that acquire a degenerative condition and those that do not. Distinctions may be made for gender, ethnicity, age, nutrition, location, diet, genetics, medical history and lifestyle choices.

Another is to assemble cohorts of patients and controls and get them to complete questionnaires deigned to isolate significant differences between the two groups.

The results obtained by both methods are questionable, but gain strength when repeated studies show the same result.

If the risk to patients is deemed minimal research can proceed to Clinical Trials , where cohorts of patients are given controlled amounts of medication and the effect on their disease is measured against a second cohort given a placebo.

Introducing new therapies

The process of proving a new therapy generally follows a set sequence:-

tests on cells in dishes (in vitro);

tests on laboratory animals with induced forms of the target disease;(in vivo)

tests on patients, generally involving larger and larger cohorts, with time to assess long term side effects and outcomes.

It is valuable if results can be corroborated at each stage by more than one independent project team.

Delays can occur for a number of reasons:-

obtaining the necessary funding for each stage in the process;

optimising the capabilities, experience and facilities of the laboratory;

the priorities assigned to unrelated projects:

maintaining continuity of staff and expertise.

Assuming that results arrive at a satisfactory outcome there are three more hurdles to overcome:-

publishing the results in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. As a general rule the more prestigious is the journal, the more stringent the review criteria and the longer the lead time on publication.

making a sound business case and carrying out a risk analysis by drug manufacturers in competition with other diseases.

meeting the requirements of national drug licencing bodies,

Parkinson's Disease tends to fare badly in this process because:-

There is no clinical diagnostic test for the disease.
There are not enough diagnosed cases compared to other diseases to justify a large investment in research.
The disease is idiosyncratic - patients have differing symptoms, rates of deterioration and varying responses to drugs, making 'one-size-fits-all' remedies harder to develop.
palliative drugs such as levadopa, which have to be taken continually in large quantities,have a greater potential profit margin than drugs which might reverse the symptoms.

It is not surprising then that many a promising hypthesis does cross the therapeutic boundary from academic research to commercial production. Contributors to patient forums show frustration at the slow progress of research and a willingness to self-medicate or experiment with alternative medicine.

Current Research

Of the recent research described in the following pages Rasagaline and Tolcapone have completed the research sequence and are prescribed. NSAIDs, Creatine and Vitamin D are available over the counter and Melatonin can be purchased via the internet.

2011

Seidl and Potashkin ^[2] evaluated a number of promising potential neuroprotective agents

Boll et al ^[3] summarized the current PD neuroprotection scene

Detail of individual agents are given in the following pages and readers are invited to update these as more research comes to light.

References

↑ Almiles-Olmes, Iciar; Dickson, John; Kefalopoulou, Zinovia; Djamshidian, Atbin; Ell,Peter; soderlund,Therese; Whitton, Peter; Wyse, Richard; Isaacs, tom; Lees,Andrew; Limousin, Thomas and Foltynie (2013) Full Text J. Clin. Invest. doi:10.1172/JCI68295. Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease http://www.jci.org/articles/view/68295
↑ Seidl,Stacey E. And Potashkin, Judith A. (2011) Full Text Front. Neurol. 2:68 The Promise of Neuroprotective Agents in Parkinson’s Disease http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3221408/
↑ Boll, Marie Catherine; Zubeldia,Mireya Alcaraz and Rios, Camilo (2011) Full Text: Curr. Neuropharmacol. 9 (2) 350 -359 Medical Management of Parkinson’s Disease: Focus on Neuroprotection. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3131725/?tool=pmcentrez

Therapy > Neuroprotection

Sub Pages:

Neuroprotective agents

Substances with possible neuroprotective properties:

Caffeine,--Celastrol,--Co-Enzyme Q10,--Creatine,--DHA,--Exendin-4 (EX-4),--GDNF,--Glutathione (GSH),--GM1,--Isradipine,--Melatonin,--Minocycline,--Nicotine,--NSAIDs,--Phenylbutyrate,--Phytic Acid,--Probucol,--Quinoxaline,--Rasagiline,--Riboflavin,--Statins,--Tolcapone,--Urate & Uric Acid,--Vitamin D,--Vitamin E,--

This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Saturday, August 29, 2015. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.

PD Neuroprotection

Definition

Introducing new therapies

Current Research

Further Reading

References

Related pages