Literature/1980/Schank

< Literature < 1980
Authors

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N
O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z &


Schank, Roger C.; Janet L. Kolodner & Gerald DeJong (1980). "Conceptual Information Retrieval." Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM conference on research and development in information retrieval (SIGIR '80, Cambridge, England, 1980) Kent, UK: Butterworth, 1981. pp. 94-116.

Authors

w: Roger C. Schank 
Department of Computer Science, Yale University
w: Janet L. Kolodner 
Department of Computer Science, Yale University
Gerald DeJong 
Department of Computer Science, Yale University

Abstract

If we want to build intelligent information retrieval systems, we will have to give them the capabilities of understanding natural language, automatically organizing and reorganizing their memories, and using intelligent heuristics for searching their memories. These systems will have to analyze and understand both new text and Natural Language queries. In answering questions, they will have to direct memory search to reasonable places. This requires good organization of both the conceptual content of text and knowledge necessary for understanding those texts and accessing memory. The CYRUS and FRUMP systems (Kolodner (1978), Schank and Kolodner (1979), Dejong (1979)) comprise an information retrieval system called CyFr. Together, they have the analysis and retrieval capabilities mentioned above. FRUMP analysis news stories from the UPI wire for their conceptual content, and produces summaries of those stories. It sends summaries of stories about important people to CYRUS automatically adds those stories to its memory, and can then retrieve that information to answer question posed to it in natural language. This paper describes the problems involved in building such an intelligent system. It proposes solutions to some of those problems bases on recent research in Artificial Intelligence and Natural Language processing, and describes the CyFr system, which implements those solutions. The solutions we propose and implement are based on a model of human understanding and memory retrieval. (Author)

Wikimedia

w: Case based reasoning
w: Natural language understanding

Chronology

Comments

Notes

    1900s ^
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29
    '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39
    '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 '46 '47 '48 '49
    '50 '51 '52 '53 '54 '55 '56 '57 '58 '59
    '60 '61 '62 '63 '64 '65 '66 '67 '68 '69
    '70 '71 '72 '73 '74 '75 '76 '77 '78 '79
    '80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89
    '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99
    2000s
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    1900s category ^
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29
    '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39
    '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 '46 '47 '48 '49
    '50 '51 '52 '53 '54 '55 '56 '57 '58 '59
    '60 '61 '62 '63 '64 '65 '66 '67 '68 '69
    '70 '71 '72 '73 '74 '75 '76 '77 '78 '79
    '80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89
    '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99
    2000s category
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    1900s works ad hoc
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29
    '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39
    '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 '46 '47 '48 '49
    '50 '51 '52 '53 '54 '55 '56 '57 '58 '59
    '60 '61 '62 '63 '64 '65 '66 '67 '68 '69
    '70 '71 '72 '73 '74 '75 '76 '77 '78 '79
    '80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89
    '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99
    2000s works
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    1900s books cat. ^
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    '20 '21 '22 '23 '24 '25 '26 '27 '28 '29
    '30 '31 '32 '33 '34 '35 '36 '37 '38 '39
    '40 '41 '42 '43 '44 '45 '46 '47 '48 '49
    '50 '51 '52 '53 '54 '55 '56 '57 '58 '59
    '60 '61 '62 '63 '64 '65 '66 '67 '68 '69
    '70 '71 '72 '73 '74 '75 '76 '77 '78 '79
    '80 '81 '82 '83 '84 '85 '86 '87 '88 '89
    '90 '91 '92 '93 '94 '95 '96 '97 '98 '99
    2000s books category
    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09
    '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15 '16 '17 '18 '19
    http://books.google.com/advanced_book_search
    The shade of the bar looks invariant in isolation but variant in context, in (favor of) sharp contrast with the color gradient background, hence an innate illusion we have to reasonably interpret and overcome as well as the mirage. Such variance appearing seasonably from context to context may not only be the case with our vision but worldview in general in practice indeed, whether a priori or a posteriori. Perhaps no worldview from nowhere, without any point of view or prejudice at all!

    Ogden & Richards (1923) said, "All experience ... is either enjoyed or interpreted ... or both, and very little of it escapes some degree of interpretation."

    H. G. Wells (1938) said, "The human individual is born now to live in a society for which his fundamental instincts are altogether inadequate."

    This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Tuesday, September 30, 2014. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.