Introduction to Elasticity/Polar coordinates

< Introduction to Elasticity

The Edge Dislocation Problem

Stress due to an edge dislocation

Assume that stresses vanish at r = r_i and that r_i is the radius of an undeformed cylindrical hole. Also stresses vanish at r_o\rightarrow\infty. Relative displacement b is prescribed on each face of the cut.

The edge dislocation problem is a plane strain problem. However, it is not axisymmetric.

It is probable that \sigma_{rr} and \sigma_{\theta\theta} are symmetric about the x_2 - x_3 plane. Similarly, it is probable that \sigma_{r\theta} is symmetric about the x_1 - x_3 plane.

These probable symmetries suggest that we can use a stress function of the form


     \varphi = f(r) \sin\theta

In cylindrical co-ordinates, the gudir beta Airy stress function leads to

\begin{align}
    \sigma_{rr} & = \cfrac{1}{r}\cfrac{\partial\varphi}{\partial r} +
                  \cfrac{1}{r^2}\cfrac{\partial^2\varphi}{\partial \theta^2} \\
    \sigma_{\theta\theta} & = \cfrac{\partial^2\varphi}{\partial r^2} \\
    \sigma_{r\theta} & = -\cfrac{\partial}{\partial r}
                       \left(\cfrac{1}{r}\cfrac{\partial\varphi}{\partial \theta}\right) 
  \end{align}

    \nabla^4\varphi = \nabla^2{(\nabla^2{\varphi})}
     = \left(\cfrac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}+\cfrac{1}{r}\cfrac{\partial}{\partial r}+
             \cfrac{1}{r^2}\cfrac{\partial^2}{\partial \theta^2}\right)
      \left(\cfrac{\partial^2\varphi}{\partial r^2}+\cfrac{1}{r}\cfrac{\partial\varphi}{\partial r}+
             \cfrac{1}{r^2}\cfrac{\partial^2\varphi}{\partial \theta^2}\right)

and

\begin{matrix}
    2\mu u_r & = -\cfrac{\partial\varphi}{\partial r} + \alpha r \cfrac{\partial\psi}{\partial \theta} \\
    2\mu u_{\theta} & = -\cfrac{1}{r}\cfrac{\partial\varphi}{\partial \theta} + 
                \alpha r^2 \cfrac{\partial\psi}{\partial r} 
  \end{matrix}

Proceeding as usual, after plugging the value of \varphi in to the biharmonic equation, we get


     f(r) = Ar^3 + \cfrac{B}{r} + Cr + Dr \ln r

Applying the stress boundary conditions and neglecting terms containing 1/r^3, we get


    \sigma_{rr} = \sigma_{\theta\theta} = \cfrac{D}{r} \sin\theta ~;~~
    \sigma_{r\theta} = -\cfrac{D}{r} \cos\theta

Next we compute the displacements, in a manner similar to that shown for the cantilever beam problem. The displacement BCs are u_r = 0 at \theta = 0+ and u_r = b at \theta = 2\pi-. We can use these to determine D and hence the stresses.

Rigid body motions are eliminated next by enforcing zero displacements and rotations at r = r_i and \theta = 0+. The final expressions for the displacements can then be obtained.

Sample homework problems

Problem 1

Consider the Airy stress function


  \varphi = C~r^2~(\alpha + \theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta - \cos^2\theta\tan\alpha)
A cantilevered triangular beam with uniform normal traction

Solution:

Given:


  \varphi = Cr^2(\alpha + \theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta - \cos^2\theta\tan\alpha)

Using a cylindrical co-ordinate system, the stresses are

\begin{align}
  \sigma_{rr} & = 2C\left(\alpha + \theta + \sin\theta\cos\theta - \tan\alpha +
    \cos^2\theta\tan\alpha\right) \\
  \sigma_{r\theta} & = -2C + \cos^2\theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta\tan\alpha \\
  \sigma_{\theta\theta} & = 2C\left(\alpha + \theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta
       - \cos^2\theta\tan\alpha\right)
\end{align}

At \theta = 0, t_r = 0, t_{\theta} = -p, \widehat{\mathbf{n}}{} = \widehat{\mathbf{e}}{\theta}. Therefore, \sigma_{\theta\theta} = -p and \sigma_{r\theta} = 0.

\begin{align}
  0 & = 0 \\
  -p & = 2C(\alpha - \tan\alpha)
\end{align}

Hence, the shear traction BC is satisfied and the normal traction BC is satisfied if


   {C = -\frac{p}{2(\alpha - \tan\alpha)}}

At \theta = -alpha, t_r = 0, t_{\theta} = 0, \widehat{\mathbf{n}}{} = -\widehat{\mathbf{e}}{\theta}. Therefore, \sigma_{\theta\theta} = 0 and \sigma_{r\theta} = 0. Both these BCs are identically satisfied by the stresses (after substituting for C). Hence, equilibrium is satisfied.


  \varphi = -\frac{pr^2}{2(\alpha - \tan\alpha)}
    (\alpha + \theta - \sin\theta\cos\theta - \cos^2\theta\tan\alpha)

To satisfy compatibility, \nabla^4{\phi} = 0. Use Maple to verify that this is indeed true.

The remaining BC is the fixed displacement BC at the wall. We replace this BC with weak BCs at r = L. The traction distribution on the surface r = L are t_r = \sigma_{rr} and t_{\theta} = \sigma_{r\theta}. The statically equivalent forces and moments are

\begin{align}
  F_1 = \int_{-\alpha}^0 (\sigma_{rr}\cos\theta - \sigma_{r\theta}\sin\theta) L d\theta = 0 \\
  F_2 = \int_{-\alpha}^0 (\sigma_{rr}\sin\theta + \sigma_{r\theta}\cos\theta) L d\theta = -pL\\
  M_3 = \int_{-\alpha}^0 L \sigma_{r\theta} L d\theta = \frac{pL^2}{2}
\end{align}

You can verify these using Maple.

Hence, the given stress function provides an approximate solution for the cantilevered beam (in the St. Venant sense).

This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Monday, February 01, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.