Astronomy/Analysis

< Astronomy

Analysis is the process of dividing a phenomenon into parts that appear to be separate.

As a part of theoretical astronomy, an analysis allows the investigator to determine which parts are already understood by previous observations and applicable models.

Previous analysis should have its findings verified statistically by comparing model-generated calculations with numerical observations.

The analysis and subsequent discussion and conclusions constitute analytical astronomy.

Analysis

Def.

  1. "[d]ecomposition into components in order to study (a complex thing, concept, theory...)",[1]
  2. the "mathematical study of functions, sequences, series, limits, derivatives and integrals",[1] or
  3. the "process of breaking down a substance into its constituent parts",[1]

is called analysis.

Def. a "minute and detailed examination or analysis"[2] is called a dissection.

X-rays

"Analytical X-ray astronomy is applied to an astronomy puzzle in an attempt to provide an acceptable solution. Consider the following puzzle."[3]

"High-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) are composed of OB supergiant companion stars and compact objects, usually neutron stars (NS) or black holes (BH). Supergiant X-ray binaries (SGXBs) are HMXBs in which the compact objects orbit massive companions with orbital periods of a few days (3–15 d), and in circular (or slightly eccentric) orbits. SGXBs show typical the hard X-ray spectra of accreting pulsars and most show strong absorption as obscured HMXBs. X-ray luminosity (Lx) increases up to 1036 erg·s−1 (1029 watts)."[3]

"The mechanism triggering the different temporal behavior observed between the classical SGXBs and the recently discovered supergiant fast X-ray transients (SFXT)s is still debated.[4]"[3]

"Aim: use the discovery of long orbits (>15 d) to help discriminate between emission models and perhaps bring constraints on the models."[3]

"Method: analyze archival data on various SGXBs such as has been obtained by INTEGRAL for candidates exhibiting long orbits. Build short- and long-term light curves. Perform a timing analysis in order to study the temporal behavior of each candidate on different time scales."[3]

"Compare various astronomical models:

"Draw some conclusions: for example, the SGXB SAX J1818.6-1703 was discovered by BeppoSAX in 1998, identified as a SGXB of spectral type between O9I−B1I, which also displayed short and bright flares and an unusually very low quiescent level leading to its classification as a SFXT.[4] The analysis indicated an unusually long orbital period: 30.0 ± 0.2 d and an elapsed accretion phase of ~6 d implying an elliptical orbit and possible supergiant spectral type between B0.5-1I with eccentricities e ~ 0.3–0.4.[4] The large variations in the X-ray flux can be explained through accretion of macro-clumps formed within the stellar wind.[4]"[3]

"Choose which model seems to work best: for SAX J1818.6-1703 the analysis best fits the model that predicts SFXTs behave as SGXBs with different orbital parameters; hence, different temporal behavior.[4]"[3]

Classical history

The classical history period dates from around 2,000 to 1,000 b2k.

"The basic trigonometry of Hipparchus was extended by scholars in Baghdad into spherical trigonometry under the stimulus of astronomical calculation. Al Farghani (d 861) first calculated longitudes and wrote down the elements of analytical astronomy."[5]

Research

Hypothesis:

  1. Analysis of observations allows the differentiation of contributory sources.

Control groups

This is an image of a Lewis rat. Credit: Charles River Laboratories.

The findings demonstrate a statistically systematic change from the status quo or the control group.

“In the design of experiments, treatments [or special properties or characteristics] are applied to [or observed in] experimental units in the treatment group(s).[6] In comparative experiments, members of the complementary group, the control group, receive either no treatment or a standard treatment.[7]"[8]

Proof of concept

Def. a “short and/or incomplete realization of a certain method or idea to demonstrate its feasibility"[9] is called a proof of concept.

Def. evidence that demonstrates that a concept is possible is called proof of concept.

The proof-of-concept structure consists of

  1. background,
  2. procedures,
  3. findings, and
  4. interpretation.[10]

See also

References

  1. 1 2 3 "analysis, In: Wiktionary". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 23 May 2014. Retrieved 2014-06-04.
  2. "dissection, In: Wiktionary". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. 24 May 2014. Retrieved 2014-06-04.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Marshallsumter (April 15, 2013). "X-ray astronomy, In: Wikipedia". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2013-05-11.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 Zurita Heras JA, Chaty S (2009). "Discovery of an eccentric 30 day period in the supergiant X-ray binary SAX J1818.6–1703 with INTEGRAL". Astronomy and Astrophysics 493 (1): L1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200811179.
  5. John Warren (2005). "War and the Cultural Heritage of Iraq: a sadly mismanaged affair". Third World Quarterly 26 (4-5): 815-30. doi:10.1080/01436590500128048. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01436590500128048. Retrieved 2014-06-04.
  6. Klaus Hinkelmann, Oscar Kempthorne (2008). Design and Analysis of Experiments, Volume I: Introduction to Experimental Design (2nd ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-471-72756-9. http://books.google.com/?id=T3wWj2kVYZgC&printsec=frontcover.
  7. R. A. Bailey (2008). Design of comparative experiments. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-68357-9. http://www.cambridge.org/uk/catalogue/catalogue.asp?isbn=9780521683579.
  8. "Treatment and control groups, In: Wikipedia". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. May 18, 2012. Retrieved 2012-05-31.
  9. "proof of concept, In: Wiktionary". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. November 10, 2012. Retrieved 2013-01-13.
  10. Ginger Lehrman and Ian B Hogue, Sarah Palmer, Cheryl Jennings, Celsa A Spina, Ann Wiegand, Alan L Landay, Robert W Coombs, Douglas D Richman, John W Mellors, John M Coffin, Ronald J Bosch, David M Margolis (August 13, 2005). "Depletion of latent HIV-1 infection in vivo: a proof-of-concept study". Lancet 366 (9485): 549-55. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(05)67098-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1894952/. Retrieved 2012-05-09.

Further reading

External links

This is a research project at http://en.wikiversity.org

Educational level: this is a research resource.
Resource type: this resource is an article.
Resource type: this resource contains a lecture or lecture notes.
Subject classification: this is an astronomy resource.
This article is issued from Wikiversity - version of the Saturday, March 26, 2016. The text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share Alike but additional terms may apply for the media files.